|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editorial GoalThe editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners. We also publish a newsletter called The Art of Health Promotion, which provides practical information to make programs more effective. The newsletter is published as a section of the American Journal of Health Promotion. Definition of Health PromotionWe define health promotion as "the science and art of helping people change their lifestyle toward a state of optimal health." We define optimal health as "a balance of physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and intellectual health. Lifestyle change can be facilitated through a combination of strategies to enhance awareness, change behavior, and create environments that support good health practices. Of the three strategies, supportive environments will probably have the greatest impact on producing lasting change" (Am J Health Promot. 1989;3:3-5). ReadershipWe have approximately 3000 subscribers and an additional 12,000 pass-along readers. On the basis of our reader surveys, approximately 72% of our readers have master's degrees and 25% have doctoral degrees. Approximately 60% are practitioners and 40% are academicians. Our aim is to publish a balanced collection of manuscripts, with about 50% being relevant to practitioners and 50% being relevant to academicians. Editorial Scope
Presubmission InquiryAuthors MUST submit a "Presubmission Inquiry" in the form of a structured abstract to the Editor, who will determine whether their manuscript fits the editorial scope of the Journal. Guidelines for preparing and submitting the structured abstract are provided at http://ajhp.allentrack.net (please note "www"is NOT used with this address). Structured abstracts should follow the parameters set out in those guidelines and should also be submitted to that website. Responses with a determination of appropriateness will normally be sent within 10 days. Submission of Manuscripts to American Journal of Health PromotionIf the Editor determines that the manuscript fits the editorial scope of the Journal, authors will be sent instructions to submit the manuscript to the allentrack.net website. Review Process and Criteria for AcceptanceAuthors are encouraged to request copies of the Editorial Review Forms appropriate to their manuscript before preparing and submitting the manuscript. These are not published in the Journal but can be requested from the editorial office by e-mail (jrichmond@allenpress.com). The initial review process normally takes 3 months. Reviews of subsequent revisions take about 2 months. Acknowledgment of articles received will be sent to authors after the editor has decided whether to send the manuscript out for review. External reviews of all manuscripts, except Critical Issues and Trends, are blind and anonymous. Internal reviews of manuscripts by the Editor are not blind or anonymous. Manuscripts are reviewed by three reviewers who include a subject matter expert, a practitioner, and a research methodologist, as appropriate. Reviewers consider the following criteria: relevance and importance to practice or research, scientific quality, presentation quality, and conformity to format guidelines. Manuscripts are reviewed with the understanding that they have not been previously published and are not under consideration by another publication.1 A complete report after publication of preliminary findings elsewhere is normally acceptable. Copies of preliminary reports and duplicative materials published elsewhere or being considered by other publications should be submitted with the manuscript and referred to in the cover letter. Authorship RequirementsEach author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. One or more authors should take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to published article. Authorship credit should be based only on (1) substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; and (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (3) final approval of the version to be published. Conditions 1, 2, and 3 must all be met.2 Authors are required to identify their contributions to the work described in the manuscript. If authorship is attributed to a group (either solely or in addition to one or more individual authors), all members of the group must meet the full criteria and requirements for authorship as described above. A group must designate at least one or more individuals as authors or members of a writing group who meet full authorship criteria and requirements and who will take responsibility for the group. Other group members who are not authors may be listed in an Acknowledgment.2 Cover LetterIn a separate document, submit a cover letter that includes the following information:
Format and Style of ManuscriptGeneral InstructionsManuscripts should be prepared in accordance with the American Medical Association Manual of Style3 and/or the "Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals."1 Use the following guidelines when preparing your manuscript for submission. Refer also to the additional guidelines specific to each type of manuscript. These are described in the section titled "Instructions for Specific Types of Manuscripts." Manuscript Submission FormatTo facilitate the blind and anonymous review process, the submitted manuscript should include 2 separate files: The manuscript and a separate title page. Submit the title page with the following information:
*The name(s) of author(s) and other listed in the acknowledgments should appear elsewhere in the manuscript. Title
of the article OutlinePrepare an outline of the manuscript, showing all main headings and subheadings. Show the word counts for the abstract and text (not including the references, tables, figures, and figure legends) at the bottom of the outline. Abstract or SynopsisThe maximum number of words depends on the type of manuscript. (See "Instructions for Specific Types of Manuscripts" below.) Do not cite references in the abstract. Key WordsImmediately below the abstract, provide 4 to 6 key words or short phrases. Whenever possible, use terms from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) list of Index Medicus, which are available online (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/meshhome.html). The key words and indexing key words, described below, are shown beneath the abstract of the published article. Indexing Key WordsThe indexing key words are intended to help readers search editorial indexes of our published manuscripts more effectively. They must be included along with your manuscript submission. Please select the appropriate key word(s) for each of the 9 factors below. List these key words, including the category, at the bottom of your abstract in the order shown - e.g., "Manuscript format: research; Research purpose: program evaluation," etc. 1. Manuscript format: (editorial/commentary/concept, literature review, research) For research articles2. Research purpose: (instrument development, intervention testing/ program
evaluation, Content focus5. Setting: (family, workplace, school, clinical/health care, local
community, Text FormatCreate the manuscript in Microsoft Word or save as a .doc file. Use 12-point Times New Roman font. The manuscript should be double-spaced with 1-inch margins on all sides. Leave the right-hand margin ragged (unjustified). Number pages in numerical order. Insert line numbers in the margin on the left-hand side of each page of the abstract and text. Line numbers are not required for references, tables, figures, or figure legends. Ensure that main headings and subheadings correspond directly to headings in the outline. Report p values as precisely as possible, rather than automatically rounding them to the 0.05 or 0.01 level. Ethical RequirementsFor experimental investigations of human subjects, state in the Methods section that an appropriate institutional review board approved the project.3(p.140) For those investigators who do not have formal ethics review committees, the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki should be followed.4 For investigations of human subjects, state in the Sample part of the Methods section the manner in which informed consent was obtained from the study participants. SO WHAT? (if required)For Quantitative Research, Qualitative Research, and Systematic Literature Review manuscripts, prepare a four- to six-sentence summary of the significance of the study. The SO WHAT? section should succinctly and conservatively state the conclusions we can draw from your study or review. It should also state the implications of your conclusions for health promotion practitioners and/or researchers. Acknowledgments (if applicable)Written permission must be obtained from each person cited in the Acknowledgments section. Submit the permission letter(s) with your cover letter. ReferencesAuthors are responsible for the accuracy of their references and for their correct citation in the text. Number references in the order in which they are cited in the text. Use superscript Arabic numerals when citing references. Begin the list of references on a separate page. References should be formatted in the American Medical Association (AMA) style. Give the complete URL and the date accessed when citing online addresses. Please also note the following:
Examples of reference style: Manuscripts that have been accepted but not published may be included; in these cases, provide the journal name followed by "In press". Do not include "personal communications" in the list of references. Rather, insert them within the text, using the following style: A written survey was administered to adults by trained, college aged interviewers (Dr. Patrick O'Malley, personal communication, April 2005). Tables and FiguresUp to six tables, figures, graphs, and illustrations are allowed. Refer to all tables, figures, graphs, and illustrations by number within the text (callouts) in the order which they appear, each type (tbles, figures, etc.) should start with number 1. For example: "Smoking was...with different smokers (Table 1)" or Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between..." Include a list of all tables, figures, etc., along with captions or titles, at the end of the article after references tables. Tables. Tables should supplement, not duplicate, the text. Prepare table files in Excel or Word format. Number tables in the order in which they are mentioned in the text. Place each table on a separate page and use appropriate orientation (portrait or landscape). Most tables can be included with the manuscript, but they need to be at the end of the references and before the lists(s) of tables, figures and figure captions, etc. Save large tables in separate files. Explain in footnotes all non-standard abbreviations used in each table. Indicate table footnotes with symbols, shown in the following order: *, ,,§, ׀,¶, #, **, , , etc. When p values are reported, use the asterisk (*) for the p values and begin the list of footnotes with the "" symbol. Figures. Prepare figures in PDF, PPT, XLS, TIFF, JPEG, or DOC format. Consult the table below for guidance on minimum and ideal figure resolutions. Save each figure in a separate file (i.e., if there are 5 figures in the manuscript, 5 figure files should be submitted along with the text file). Place figure legends, double-spaced, at the end of the text file, after the tables; if there are no tables, the figure legends should follow the list of references.
* ppi indicates pixels per inch. File SizeFiles greater than 5 MB may cause problems for editors and reviewers. If any of your files are greater than 5 MB, please contact the AllenTrack support team (support@allentrack.net) before submitting your files. Instructions for Specific Types of Manuscripts Quantitative ResearchReview Criteria. Quantitative research manuscripts are evaluated based
on their relevance, the quality of the design and execution of the study, and
the quality of the reporting of the study. Qualitative ResearchReview Criteria. Qualitative Research manuscripts are evaluated based
on their relevance, the quality of the design and execution of the study, and
the quality of the reporting of the study. Systematic Literature ReviewsReview Criteria. Systematic Literature Review manuscripts are
evaluated based on their relevance, scope and design of the review process,
accuracy and astuteness in recognizing trends, and presentation quality of the
review. Critical Issues and TrendsTypes of Articles. Articles published in this section describe events
and constructs that are having or will have a major impact on health promotion
practice or research. Articles might describe important legislation, research
breakthroughs, emerging trends, paradigm shifts, emerging policy, or a wide
range of other topics. Applied Research BriefsTypes of Articles. Applied Research Briefs are designed to provide
readers with pertinent research findings in a condensed format. These include
original studies that are not appropriate for full-length manuscripts but that
are relevant to the practice of health promotion. These articles highlight work
that can influence how, where, when, what, and for whom health promotion
services are provided. The study findings should be succinct and focused and
provide a clear message about how they apply to the practitioner. The Applied
Research Brief format is appropriate for studies that fall into the following
categories: preliminary studies; simple comparisons between two or more program
alternatives; and studies that have methodologic flaws, such as small sample
sizes or lack of a control group, yet convey important findings.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||